Unsupported Browser

We've detected an older browser version that will not give you the best experience while using The Atlas. Please consider revisitng this site after downloading one of the alternatives below.

City of Pueblo commits $6M of ARPA funding to project proposals for community economic recovery

The City of Pueblo

Pueblo, CO

The City of Pueblo, CO, required a framework to evaluate and prioritize projects for distribution of its $36.7M in ARPA funding. Using an efficient and repeatable scoring methodology, the city approved 12 approvals and committed $6M of its funds.

Topics Covered

Transparency
Fiscal Uncertainty

Cost

Initial: 15 Thousand USD

Funding

Grants

Project Status

Operational since 2022

Gov Champion

Mayor's Office

Problem Addressed

The City of Pueblo needed a method for evaluating and prioritizing proposals for ARPA funding to ensure the proper allocation of funds. 

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) provided $36.7 million in emergency funding to the City of Pueblo, Colorado, to remedy the mismatch between rising costs and falling revenues.

With this tremendous financial infusion, a methodology for evaluating and prioritizing project proposals was crucial to enable the proper allocation of funds.

In addition to meeting the Treasury Guidance, the City of Pueblo wants to ensure that it meets the needs of its citizens, beginning with the most immediate and urgent needs without forsaking the long-term, sustainable vision of the City. It is more important than ever to have a system and repeatable methodology to evaluate and prioritize the allocation of funds accessible to citizens, staff, and decision-makers.

City of Pueblo Mayor Nick Gradisar, and his Chief of Staff, Laura Solano, needed to find a fair, repeatable and efficient methodology for evaluating and prioritizing projects and proposals to ensure that each was assessed against the same rubric. This ensures that the City maintains the highest level of transparency and accountability and provides the citizens with access to the decision-making process.

Solutions Used

Pueblo used a Priority Based Budgeting scoring rubric to evaluate ARPA funding proposals, enhancing transparency within the process.

The City of Pueblo, Colorado, received its first tranche of ARPA funds in the summer of 2021 and it was imperative to the Mayor and Council that they have a clear, fair, transparent, and repeatable process to apply to the proposals coming in. This was to ensure an equitable and fair distribution of the funds and also to ensure clear communication to citizens of the decision-making process.

The City worked with ResourceX to establish a custom scoring matrix based on the seven pillars of their community. In conjunction with the What Works Cities City Budgeting for Equity and Recovery program, additional proposal scoring categories were added to the matrix to help support the evaluation of the ARPA proposals coming in.

"We needed a methodology to prioritize and be compliant. In working with ResourceX, we said, What do we really need to do? This has been an incredible tool. It has been standardized and easy to refer back to. It is a community-driven ARPA process to meet the needs of the recovery from COVID." - Laura Solano, Chief of Staff, City of Pueblo.

In building the scoring matrix used to evaluate and prioritize ARPA proposals, the City utilized seven pillars of focus: Individuals & Households, Tourism & Hospitality, Youth, Non-Profits, Small Businesses, Infrastructure, and Community Resilience. A set of criteria is used to score proposals on how well they move the needle on each pillar, including, Eligibility, Cost, Sustainability (the ability to be funded beyond the one-time use of ARPA funds), Community Benefitting, Equity, and Infrastructure (to flag proposals that could instead be eligible for funding through the Infrastructure Law). Each of these criteria can receive a score of 0, 2, or 4. Programs with the highest overall score will be ranked as the most impactful and highest priority.

Using the PBB standardized scoring methodology, the City has fairly and transparently approved 12 proposals and committed $6 million of their $36.7 million in funding. Approved projects that will utilize ARPA funding include a summer reading incentive program that will pay kids $100 each for reading 10 books during the summer, a day labor program that will pay unhoused residents to pick up trash around the city, and a program to incentivize city employees to get vaccinated. Furthermore, $1 million has also been committed to non-profit projects to hire mental health professionals to provide services to the Police Department, to connect low-income tenants with legal resources to prevent eviction, and to help the soup kitchen meet increased demand from the pandemic.

Outcomes

1

The City has approved 12 ARPA proposals and committed $6 million of its funding using the new evaluation process.

2

A method to score, evaluate and prioritize all proposals through a process that meets the needs of citizens while maintaining the long-term vision of the City.

3

Implementation of the most aligned and impactful proposals for the benefit of Pueblo residents and the community

4

The new proposal evaluation method provides Pueblo’s citizens with greater visibility around the decision-making process.

5

$1 million in ARPA funding has been committed to projects put forward by nonprofit organizations, such as adding mental health professionals to the police department staff, and many others.

Something Unique

Pueblo gained national recognition for its summer reading incentive program, using $1 million in ARPA funding to award 7,074 youths $100 each for reading 10 books during the summer.

Who Should Consider

Any municipality looking to generate, evaluate and prioritize projects and proposals to utilize their American Rescue Plan Act funds.

Last Updated

Mar 25th, 2022
More Local Gov Case Studies from The Atlas Database
The Atlas case study database features examples of city projects – including both earth-moving projects and installed technologies – from around the world. You will not find proposed projects, or links to research studies and planning documents. There are 500+ member submitted case studies to browse - see related case studies to this one below:
Browse All Case Studies