Broadband and high speed internet accessibility enables people to learn and work online. Access to high speed internet has never been more important. Not having access to it effectively excludes a person from many aspects of modern society. 17 million Americans do not have basic broadband, according to the NTIA. Notably, disadvantaged, rural and tribal communities have significantly less access to broadband internet than higher income households.
A large percentage of state and local governments have already identified improving internet access for rural and low income residents to be a foundational prerequisite for much of their strategic plans to build more equitable and inclusive cities.
Almost $65 billion in the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) will be spent building broadband infrastructure with the goal of expanding high-speed internet access across the country. The broadband funding included in IIJA seeks to expand on investments already made in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021 and American Rescue Plan (ARP).
This section includes the broadband-focused reauthorized and newly established programs in the Infrastructure Deal, and the relative speed at which local governments can expect to see the money from them. It also includes case studies from state and local governments that have successfully implemented broadband and other high speed internet access projects in their communities that achieve goals relevant to those outlined in the legislation.
The funding priorities for broadband and high-speed internet access are outlined in the legislation itself. They are outlined below.
The projects most likely to be funded through IIJA will touch on these key broadband priorities:
While the extensive federal agency rule-making processes are underway, state and local government leaders are starting the preparatory work to best position their communities to receive as much funding as possible to implement transformational broadband infrastructure.
We know that dedicated federal programs don’t currently exist for broadband expansion – historically, these efforts have existed in pieces and parts under several agencies. This means that the money included in IIJA for broadband and high-speed internet accessibility will be funneled through newly created programs. Creating new federal programs is a significant process that takes time – this is especially true for something like broadband expansion, which will likely require collaboration from several federal agencies.
Ultimately, this means that state and local governments are likely to see federal money for broadband expansion relatively slowly, especially when compared to other funding categories like transportation and water, that will move a large percentage of relevant IIJA funding through reauthorized programs.
IIJA includes three newly established grant programs for broadband that are relevant to state and local governments. How quickly state and local governments will see funding from these broadband infrastructure programs depends on the specific rules and regulations within these newly established competitive grants.
State and local governments will see money from newly established formula programs later than reauthorized programs. Any funding that relies on an entirely new program will take longer than money funneling through a reauthorized program. Newly established formula programs tend to be more straightforward to stand up than newly established competitive grants. The broadband competitive grant programs most relevant to state and local government leaders are:
After that, state and local governments are likely to see money from newly created competitive grant programs. This money tends to move the slowest.
Of course, this sequencing is a generalization. The exact sequencing of when state and local governments will receive money from the programs above depends on the complexity of the program involved. For example, certain newly established formula funds may require significant data collection to write allocation formulas. When that’s the case, funds through those programs will be slower to arrive.
In this section, we’ve compiled a list of broadband infrastructure case studies from state and local governments who have successfully implemented broadband and other high-speed internet access projects that are consistent with the funding priorities in IIJA.
Our hope is that they 1) inspire state and local government broadband leaders about the impacts and outcomes that can be achieved with the coming influx of federal money, and 2) serve as models for impactful projects to put forward for IIJA funding.
Income equality impacted broadband access in San Jose, leaving 95,000 residents without home internet access. With the aid of P3 partnerships in implementing a Small Cell Broadband Infrastructure project, the city reduced the digital divide by installing small cell antennas on 4,000 city-owned light poles.
The City of Chula Vista built on its smart city progress by addressing the digital divide through the creation of a groundbreaking Digital Equity and Inclusion Plan (DEIP). The DEIP is an actionable roadmap to expand access to Internet connectivity, devices, and digital literacy training for all community members.
Warm Springs Indian Reservation struggled with internet access due to the lack of broadband infrastructure. During the pandemic, the Reservation was unable to cope with the switch to remote work and school. With an influx of CARES funding, the reservation was able to offer residents reliable broadband service and set up free Wi-Fi hubs.
In addition, these resources are excellent starting places for local broadband leaders who don’t have a lot of experience with digital equity issues and broadband expansion:
We hope these case studies inspire you and demonstrate the scale and type of community impacts that are possible with the broadband investments included in IIJA. If you’d like to see more, browse the broadband case studies in The Atlas case study database.
Next up: Resilient Infrastructure & IIJA: Funding, Timelines, Model Projects.
Author’s Note: Rachel Angulo (Content Marketing Manager at The Atlas) provided writing and research support to this section. Mark Funkhouser (Former Mayor of Kansas City, MO), Shalini Vajjhala (Executive Director of the San Diego Regional Policy & Innovation Center) and Erik Caldwell (Director of Data Strategy at The Atlas and former Deputy Chief Operating Officer at the City of San Diego) generously reviewed this section.